Overview
HubSpot closed-won deals + full lead universe, classified by verified attribution.
Revenue by Attribution Bucket
First-touch priority. Click a bar to filter the deals table.
Channels Within Each Bucket
Marketing-Originated deals classified by first-touch channel; Assisted by mid-journey touch.
The Tracking Gap
The #1 blocker to better attribution.
These deals were manually created by reps — no first-touch, no campaign, no self-report. They may have started from marketing (word-of-mouth from a past event, an SEO visit that never filled a form, a referral from an existing customer), but HubSpot literally doesn't know. Fixing this is the highest-leverage system improvement we can make.
Recommended next steps: require lead-source field on manual contact creation · route all inbound calls through a tracked number · tag all event badge scans with the event campaign · add a "How did you hear about us?" field to every quote request.
Headline Findings
The story marketing needs to tell tomorrow.
deals where HubSpot verified marketing sourced the lead. This is the number marketing can defend line-by-line.
deals where marketing didn't source the lead but a mid-journey event or campaign touch helped close it — mostly InfoComm/NAB follow-up sequences.
Brad Plant first-touched via Organic Search (Feb 2024), then converted through the InfoComm 2025 nurture email. Marketing owns both first and last touch — the clearest attribution story in the whole book.
5 ChatGPT + 1 Gemini — the first cohort of leads discovering Neoti through generative AI. Not yet in closed-won, but early pipeline signal worth optimizing for.
Closed-Won Deals
33 deals · $6.18M total · Click a row to see full attribution journey.
| Deal | Bucket | Channel | Amount | Close Date | Owner |
|---|
Lead Volume by Channel
3,341 leads created in 2026 YTD.
Leads by Month
Feb 2026 spike = one-time CAD bulk import (2,419 leads).
Signal-Bearing Leads
leads from digital / event / referral channels. Excludes bulk offline imports.
| Contact | Company | Channel | Created | Lifecycle | Self-Report |
|---|
Attribution Flow — Leads to Closed-Won
Signal-bearing leads (left) flow into the pipeline pool; closed-won deals (right) split by attribution bucket. Bulk offline lead imports excluded.
Winning Path Patterns
The repeatable plays behind marketing-influenced closes.
Search → Time +
Email Nurture → Closed-Won
neoti.com → Closed-Won
Contact → InfoComm/NAB
Campaign Touch → Closed-Won
Contact → Marketing
Email Sequence → Closed-Won
AI-Referral Leads — Early Signal
First cohort of leads finding Neoti through ChatGPT and Gemini. Not in closed-won yet, but a leading indicator of AI-search visibility.
What This Means
Generative AI is now a lead source. Six leads in the past 6 months came from ChatGPT or Gemini answering LED-display questions and citing Neoti. The pattern will accelerate.
Recommended action: Track AI-referral leads as a first-class channel. Optimize product pages, spec sheets, and market pages for AI retrieval. Add utm_source=ai tracking where possible. Ensure Neoti appears in AI answers for TAA-compliant, control-room, and broadcast LED display queries.